Dear readers of our blog, coming to a close what was a very animated week from political point of view. The long-awaited
BUDGET seems finally ready. Next week you should go to vote in Council, and then (it was even now) will have its Adrano financial instrument. Obviously everything is much more complicated than those expressed in these two simple lines: Meeting the "river" of the committee, insults (later retracted), threats of lawsuits, requests for amendments and so on ...
In this context, the long-awaited confrontation Vadala - Mancuso seems to no longer have place. At least they would be councilor's intentions to the financial statements, a few days before, during a self-managed space, invited the Hon. Mancuso to a televised debate but then postpone everything until a later date. Maybe it's even better that way but would have required a little more carefully before you invite to this or that "dueling" TV ...
Returning to the budget, the Commission has been the decisive vote of the directors which would soon become the majority (but they were not already entered? Mah!). At this point, waiting to see how many and what new Ferrante appoint commissioners in the coming weeks (after the approval now certain financial instrument) and what advisers will expression.
Requests advisers "dissidents" (Stancampiano, Arrigo, and it also says Politi Pulvirenti) will be accepted in toto? Or you must find an agreement that satisfies all without the risk of putting a bad light on an administration that had signaled for his "robust policy" and now is having to increase the number of seats to make everyone happy?
Noting that the former commissioner has filed a complaint in Newfoundland which highlights those which, according to his point of view, were "flawed" and "distortions" that characterized the first months administrative work, we invite you to reflect.
It 'just that even today, especially in the difficult situation that our city lives on a daily basis, "doing politics" to Adrano think it means to himself (instead of the city and the needs of citizens) and to grab a seat of government (read Department) for themselves or for a friend, with the sole aim of increasing their own "personal power" and they forgot all the rest, as has been done?
We only hope that the names you hear every day around and find no confirmation in this regard we appeal to Why go mayor to appoint someone truly competent that they can to serve the city.
BUDGET seems finally ready. Next week you should go to vote in Council, and then (it was even now) will have its Adrano financial instrument. Obviously everything is much more complicated than those expressed in these two simple lines: Meeting the "river" of the committee, insults (later retracted), threats of lawsuits, requests for amendments and so on ...
In this context, the long-awaited confrontation Vadala - Mancuso seems to no longer have place. At least they would be councilor's intentions to the financial statements, a few days before, during a self-managed space, invited the Hon. Mancuso to a televised debate but then postpone everything until a later date. Maybe it's even better that way but would have required a little more carefully before you invite to this or that "dueling" TV ...
Returning to the budget, the Commission has been the decisive vote of the directors which would soon become the majority (but they were not already entered? Mah!). At this point, waiting to see how many and what new Ferrante appoint commissioners in the coming weeks (after the approval now certain financial instrument) and what advisers will expression.
Requests advisers "dissidents" (Stancampiano, Arrigo, and it also says Politi Pulvirenti) will be accepted in toto? Or you must find an agreement that satisfies all without the risk of putting a bad light on an administration that had signaled for his "robust policy" and now is having to increase the number of seats to make everyone happy?
Noting that the former commissioner has filed a complaint in Newfoundland which highlights those which, according to his point of view, were "flawed" and "distortions" that characterized the first months administrative work, we invite you to reflect.
It 'just that even today, especially in the difficult situation that our city lives on a daily basis, "doing politics" to Adrano think it means to himself (instead of the city and the needs of citizens) and to grab a seat of government (read Department) for themselves or for a friend, with the sole aim of increasing their own "personal power" and they forgot all the rest, as has been done?
We only hope that the names you hear every day around and find no confirmation in this regard we appeal to Why go mayor to appoint someone truly competent that they can to serve the city.
0 comments:
Post a Comment